• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
dashboard.forestdeclaration.org

dashboard.forestdeclaration.org

  • Home
  • GLD Articles
    • Article 1: Ecosystems
    • Article 2: Trade
    • Article 3: Livelihoods
    • Article 4: Agriculture
    • Article 5: Increasing finance
    • Article 6: Aligning finance
  • About Us

Mayotte

Conserving the world’s forests can generate multiple climate benefits by preventing the release of their large carbon stores into the atmosphere, safeguarding their ability to continue sequestering carbon, and, for tropical forests, maintaining the biophysical mechanisms that help to cool the planet. To help secure these benefits, the Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration has established the collective goal of halting forest loss—which includes reaching zero gross deforestation—by 2030.  
The world permanently lost at least 5.8 million hectares (Mha) of forests in 2022, with some estimating that the loss was even higher at 6.6 Mha. Global deforestation increased slightly compared to 2021. Should current trends continue, the world will fail to halt permanent forest loss by 2030. The annual rate of gross deforestation instead must fall by nearly 1 Mha each year throughout the rest of this decade to deliver on the GLD’s goal.

 

Deforestation and the trajectory to the 2030 goal (with and without areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires)

Why do we provide two estimates of deforestation?

Deforestation is defined as the permanent conversion of natural forest cover to new, non-forest land uses. Different global data and methods can be used to approximate deforestation, though none perfectly captures trends in permanent forest loss.

Here, we provide two estimates resulting from two different methodologies. Both use a combination of datasets available on Global Forest Watch and estimate deforestation as the areas of tree cover loss where the dominant driver is the production of commodities (namely large-scale agriculture and pastures, and mining), urbanization, or the expansion of shifting agriculture in humid tropical primary forests.

However, the two methodologies treat the presence of fires differently. Tree cover loss from fire includes both natural and human-ignited fires where fire was the direct cause of loss (e.g., does not include burning of felled trees), and can be temporary in nature or lead to permanent land use change.

To illustrate this point, one methodology—described in the State of Climate Action 2023—excludes all tree cover loss due to fire that occurs within the areas described above, while the other methodology—described in the 2023 Forest Declaration Assessment—does not.

While neither of the resulting estimates can be considered perfectly accurate, each serves as an effort to present a realistic depiction of global deforestation trends.

 

Deforestation (including areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires)

When including areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires, the Forest Declaration Assessment finds that deforestation occurred across 6.6 Mha worldwide in 2022. This represents a 4% increase compared to 2021.

 

Deforestation (excluding areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires)

When excluding areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires, the State of Climate Action 2023 finds that 5.8 Mha of deforestation occurred globally in 2022—a 7% increase relative to 2021.

Conserving the world’s forests can generate multiple climate benefits by preventing the release of their large carbon stores into the atmosphere, safeguarding their ability to continue sequestering carbon, and, for tropical forests, maintaining the biophysical mechanisms that help to cool the planet. To help secure these benefits, the Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration has established the collective goal of halting forest loss—which includes reaching zero gross deforestation—by 2030.  
The world permanently lost at least 5.8 million hectares (Mha) of forests in 2022, with some estimating that the loss was even higher at 6.6 Mha. Global deforestation increased slightly compared to 2021. Should current trends continue, the world will fail to halt permanent forest loss by 2030. The annual rate of gross deforestation instead must fall by nearly 1 Mha each year throughout the rest of this decade to deliver on the GLD’s goal.

 

Deforestation and the trajectory to the 2030 goal (with and without areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires)

Why do we provide two estimates of deforestation?

Deforestation is defined as the permanent conversion of natural forest cover to new, non-forest land uses. Different global data and methods can be used to approximate deforestation, though none perfectly captures trends in permanent forest loss.

Here, we provide two estimates resulting from two different methodologies. Both use a combination of datasets available on Global Forest Watch and estimate deforestation as the areas of tree cover loss where the dominant driver is the production of commodities (namely large-scale agriculture and pastures, and mining), urbanization, or the expansion of shifting agriculture in humid tropical primary forests.

However, the two methodologies treat the presence of fires differently. Tree cover loss from fire includes both natural and human-ignited fires where fire was the direct cause of loss (e.g., does not include burning of felled trees), and can be temporary in nature or lead to permanent land use change.

To illustrate this point, one methodology—described in the State of Climate Action 2023—excludes all tree cover loss due to fire that occurs within the areas described above, while the other methodology—described in the 2023 Forest Declaration Assessment—does not.

While neither of the resulting estimates can be considered perfectly accurate, each serves as an effort to present a realistic depiction of global deforestation trends.

 

Deforestation (including areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires)

When including areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires, the Forest Declaration Assessment finds that deforestation occurred across 6.6 Mha worldwide in 2022. This represents a 4% increase compared to 2021.

 

Deforestation (excluding areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires)

When excluding areas of tree cover loss cleared by fires, the State of Climate Action 2023 finds that 5.8 Mha of deforestation occurred globally in 2022—a 7% increase relative to 2021.

Stretching across roughly 460 million hectares (Mha) as of 2018, forests that are highly significant for biodiversity are disproportionately important for supporting forest-dependent species. Designation of these areas of high significance for forests accounts for both species richness and endemism across forests globally, and is complementary to key biodiversity areas, which also include important areas for geographically restricted species. Key biodiversity areas, however, determine important sites for biodiversity according to a broader range of criteria, including ecological integrity, threat status, or irreplaceability.  
Loss of forest habitat in areas with high significance for biodiversity, specifically, may have outsized impacts on the species that inhabit these areas, but tree cover loss in these areas continues to occur. In 2022, for example, the world lost 2.2 Mha of tree cover in areas of high significance for forest biodiversity, with over a quarter of these losses concentrated in Brazil, Indonesia, and Madagascar. 

Stretching across roughly 460 million hectares (Mha) as of 2018, forests that are highly significant for biodiversity are disproportionately important for supporting forest-dependent species. Designation of these areas of high significance for forests accounts for both species richness and endemism across forests globally, and is complementary to key biodiversity areas, which also include important areas for geographically restricted species. Key biodiversity areas, however, determine important sites for biodiversity according to a broader range of criteria, including ecological integrity, threat status, or irreplaceability.  
Loss of forest habitat in areas with high significance for biodiversity, specifically, may have outsized impacts on the species that inhabit these areas, but tree cover loss in these areas continues to occur. In 2022, for example, the world lost 2.2 Mha of tree cover in areas of high significance for forest biodiversity, with over a quarter of these losses concentrated in Brazil, Indonesia, and Madagascar. 

Forest cover loss in key biodiversity areas is particularly concerning, as these areas play an outsized role in conserving biodiversity, due to, for example, being ecologically intact, or hosting species that live in just a few geographies. But in 2022, the world’s forested key biodiversity areas lost 1.2 million hectares (Mha) of forests. The good news is that this is a 30% decrease in forest loss relative to the annual average from 2018 to 2020, indicating that the world is making strides forward in eliminating tree cover loss in these critical biodiversity sites. The bad news is that even small amounts of loss within these key biodiversity areas can significantly harm biodiversity.  

Forest cover loss in key biodiversity areas is particularly concerning, as these areas play an outsized role in conserving biodiversity, due to, for example, being ecologically intact, or hosting species that live in just a few geographies. But in 2022, the world’s forested key biodiversity areas lost 1.2 million hectares (Mha) of forests. The good news is that this is a 30% decrease in forest loss relative to the annual average from 2018 to 2020, indicating that the world is making strides forward in eliminating tree cover loss in these critical biodiversity sites. The bad news is that even small amounts of loss within these key biodiversity areas can significantly harm biodiversity.  

Herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides are used globally to enhance crop yields and promote food security. Despite their utility, pesticides also pose risks to human health (especially to farmworkers and surrounding communities) and the environment (e.g., biodiversity loss, air and water pollution). The quantities of pesticides used per area of cropland can be used as a proxy to monitor potential overuse of pesticides. This indicator assumes that the more pesticides are used, the greater is the risk of adverse outcomes for human health and the environment. However, the indicator is unable to account for how the risk of pesticide overuse differs across the world, dependent on regional conditions (including biodiversity levels and water scarcity), the compartment of the environment that is affected (e.g., air, soil, water), and the type of pesticide considered. Globally, pesticide use per area of cropland has been increasing rather than decreasing, rising 27% from 2000 to 2021. 

Herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides are used globally to enhance crop yields and promote food security. Despite their utility, pesticides also pose risks to human health (especially to farmworkers and surrounding communities) and the environment (e.g., biodiversity loss, air and water pollution). The quantities of pesticides used per area of cropland can be used as a proxy to monitor potential overuse of pesticides. This indicator assumes that the more pesticides are used, the greater is the risk of adverse outcomes for human health and the environment. However, the indicator is unable to account for how the risk of pesticide overuse differs across the world, dependent on regional conditions (including biodiversity levels and water scarcity), the compartment of the environment that is affected (e.g., air, soil, water), and the type of pesticide considered. Globally, pesticide use per area of cropland has been increasing rather than decreasing, rising 27% from 2000 to 2021. 

Agrobiodiversity is a key component of more sustainable agriculture. It can enhance the resilience and adaptability of farming systems to climate change by improving carbon sequestration in soil and biomass, as well as improving genetic diversity for breeding crops and livestock that are more resilient to climate change and other stressors. The Agrobiodiversity Index (ABDI) is a set of 22 indicators developed to monitor the most essential aspects of agrobiodiversity as it relates to food system sustainability – specifically across three key pillars: consumption, production, and genetic resource conservation. The indicators are sorted into three measurement categories: 1) action: indicators that monitor interventions to enhance biodiversity levels, 2) commitment: indicators that measure levels of support for improving biodiversity levels, and 3) status: indicators that evaluate the level of biodiversity in a country. The ABDI scores range from 0 (least desirable) to 100 (most desirable). The Agrobiodiversity Index can be used to assess the diversity of crops and livestock. It is a useful tool for monitoring the state of agrobiodiversity in different countries and regions.  
The 2021 Agrobiodiversity Index report, which evaluates the ABDI scores for 80 countries, found the mean agrobiodiversity status score to be 56 out of 100. Agrobiodiversity Index scores in consumption and conservation are 14–82% higher in developed countries than those of low-income countries. A comparison of the Agrobiodiversity Index scores of 80 countries revealed just 12 countries with high scores (60-80 scores) for agrobiodiversity status and action. 

Agrobiodiversity is a key component of more sustainable agriculture. It can enhance the resilience and adaptability of farming systems to climate change by improving carbon sequestration in soil and biomass, as well as improving genetic diversity for breeding crops and livestock that are more resilient to climate change and other stressors. The Agrobiodiversity Index (ABDI) is a set of 22 indicators developed to monitor the most essential aspects of agrobiodiversity as it relates to food system sustainability – specifically across three key pillars: consumption, production, and genetic resource conservation. The indicators are sorted into three measurement categories: 1) action: indicators that monitor interventions to enhance biodiversity levels, 2) commitment: indicators that measure levels of support for improving biodiversity levels, and 3) status: indicators that evaluate the level of biodiversity in a country. The ABDI scores range from 0 (least desirable) to 100 (most desirable). The Agrobiodiversity Index can be used to assess the diversity of crops and livestock. It is a useful tool for monitoring the state of agrobiodiversity in different countries and regions.  
The 2021 Agrobiodiversity Index report, which evaluates the ABDI scores for 80 countries, found the mean agrobiodiversity status score to be 56 out of 100. Agrobiodiversity Index scores in consumption and conservation are 14–82% higher in developed countries than those of low-income countries. A comparison of the Agrobiodiversity Index scores of 80 countries revealed just 12 countries with high scores (60-80 scores) for agrobiodiversity status and action. 

Footer

Content on the website is managed by the Forest Declaration Assessment Partners, who collaborated with Systems Change Lab on charts displaying the Systems Change Lab logo.

  • All Rights Reserved
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
linkedin logo X logo
dashboard.forestdeclaration.org
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}